We recently overviewed Michigan’s proposed legislation, HB 5951 that would effectively allow ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft to operate statewide by preempting local regulations. Here is a quick update to the status of this proposed legislation.
Michigan’s House of Representatives Fails to Pass HB 5951 on Wednesday
As reported by MLive, Michigan’s House of Representatives did not pass HB 5951 yesterday. A House committee approved the bill last week and sent it to the House floor for a vote. The bill would permit ride-sharing services to operate in Michigan provided they met certain requirements (outlined here) that are largely consistent with Uber’s current practices.
Yesterday, the House failed to pass the bill. The bill is still alive, however. Here is what happened, as outlined in the Journal of the House of Representatives for yesterday’s session.
- The House made certain changes to the bill, including exempting from Michigan’s Freedom of Information Act any list of ride-sharing drivers provided to the state as required by the bill.
- An amendment was proposed, but failed to pass, that would allow local municipalities to still pass their own ride-sharing regulations, even those more restrictive than state law. This would effectively strip HB 5951 from having its primary impact (of having uniform state-wide requirements for ride-sharing services). In particular, the amendment stated:
Sec. 11. (1) This act does not prohibit a municipality or a group of municipalities that form an authority to regulate transportation network companies under the municipal partnership act, 2011 PA 258, MCL 124.111 to 124.123, or the public transportation authority act, 1986 PA 196, MCL 124.451 to 124.479, from adopting a rule, ordinance, or resolution that is more restrictive than this act.
- When at least 50 representatives voted against the bill’s passage, the House passed on the agenda item.
- The House will reconvene at 10am today, December 11, and may take up the bill again. You can watch a live webcast of today’s House session here.
Opposition from Insurance Industry
The insurance industry continues to vigorously oppose the bill in its current form, as laid out in its December 9 letter to the House. One of their primary complaints is the gap in coverage for a ride-sharing driver who is on duty, but not currently carrying a passenger.
According to the executive director of the Insurance Institute of Michigan, HB 5951 leaves a gap in coverage that “may leave drivers and passengers of ride sharing companies at financial risk.”
In the meantime, all eyes will be on the House floor today to see if an agreement can be reached to allow HB 5951 to pass a House vote.